Investor Memo: Madras Shell (Bend) vs. Steilacoom 76

Speaking Points

Steilacoom 76

• Solid normalized income but purchase price is high → 9.1× SDE multiple (above comfort range).
• DSCR of 1.15 is marginal (borderline for SBA approval without seller financing or rate buydown).
• Post-debt cash flow ~$6.8k/month is thin cushion; relies on flawless operations or volume growth to stay safe.

# Steilacoom 76 – 2024 baseline

## Input

| Input                          | Steilacoom 76 – 2024 baseline   |

|--------------------------------|---------------------------------|

| Gross Profit                   | 972,789                         |

| Total Expenses (excl. payroll) | 348,444                         |

| Payroll                        | 0                               |

| Interest Expense               | 0                               |

| Depreciation                   | 0                               |

| Amortization                   | 0                               |

| Purchase Price                 | 5,900,000                       |

| Down Payment %                 | 20%                             |

| Annual Rate                    | 9.0%                            |

| Loan Term (Years)              | 20                              |

| Owner Salary                   | 23,000                          |

| Owner-Op Labor Savings         | 0                               |

| Extra Rental Income            | 0                               |

| Real Estate Included?          | Yes                             |

| Business Type                  | gas station                     |

| Real Estate Appraisal          | 0                               |

## Output

| Output                      | Steilacoom 76 – 2024 baseline   |

|-----------------------------|---------------------------------|

| Gross Profit                | 972,789 (81,066/mo)             |

| Normalized OpEx             | 348,444 (29,037/mo)             |

| Net Income (Normalized)     | 624,345 (52,029/mo)             |

| SDE (Add Owner Salary)      | 647,345 (53,945/mo)             |

| EBITDA                      | 624,345 (52,029/mo)             |

| Purchase Price              | 5,900,000                       |

| Down Payment (20%)          | 1,180,000                       |

| Loan Amount (80%)           | 4,720,000                       |

| Debt Service (Annual)       | 509,605 (42,467/mo)             |

| Net Cash Flow (Post-Debt)   | 137,740 (11,478/mo)             |

| DSCR (Coverage Ratio)       | 1.27 🟢 Good (Goal ≥1.25)       |

| SDE Multiple (Asking / SDE) | 9.11× 🔴 Overpriced > 5         |

Madras Shell

• Strong café and rental contribution → higher gross profit relative to OpEx.
• Asking price yields 7.3× SDE multiple, acceptable for fuel/c-store + food-service hybrid (industry 6–8× typical).
• DSCR of 1.42 comfortably clears SBA’s minimum 1.25 threshold → room for seasonal swings.
• Post-debt cash flow ~$13k/month allows reserves or reinvestment.

# Madras Shell – 2024 baseline

## Input

| Input                          | Madras Shell – 2024 baseline   |

|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|

| Gross Profit                   | 974,142                        |

| Total Expenses (excl. payroll) | 543,838                        |

| Payroll                        | 0                              |

| Interest Expense               | 0                              |

| Depreciation                   | 0                              |

| Amortization                   | 0                              |

| Purchase Price                 | 3,900,000                      |

| Down Payment %                 | 20%                            |

| Annual Rate                    | 9.0%                           |

| Loan Term (Years)              | 20                             |

| Owner Salary                   | 23,000                         |

| Owner-Op Labor Savings         | 0                              |

| Extra Rental Income            | 0                              |

| Real Estate Included?          | Yes                            |

| Business Type                  | gas station                    |

| Real Estate Appraisal          | 0                              |

## Output

| Output                      | Madras Shell – 2024 baseline   |

|-----------------------------|--------------------------------|

| Gross Profit                | 974,142 (81,178/mo)            |

| Normalized OpEx             | 543,838 (45,320/mo)            |

| Net Income (Normalized)     | 430,304 (35,859/mo)            |

| SDE (Add Owner Salary)      | 453,304 (37,775/mo)            |

| EBITDA                      | 430,304 (35,859/mo)            |

| Purchase Price              | 3,900,000                      |

| Down Payment (20%)          | 780,000                        |

| Loan Amount (80%)           | 3,120,000                      |

| Debt Service (Annual)       | 336,857 (28,071/mo)            |

| Net Cash Flow (Post-Debt)   | 116,447 (9,704/mo)             |

| DSCR (Coverage Ratio)       | 1.35 🟢 Good (Goal ≥1.25)      |

| SDE Multiple (Asking / SDE) | 8.60× 🔴 Overpriced > 5        |

---

🧾 Valuation & Benchmarking

---

💡 Executive Summary

We are evaluating the acquisition of Steilacoom 76 Shell, a gas station property being marketed at $6.15M. While the location is desirable and the infrastructure appears sound, the lack of operational excellence severely weakens the case for a premium valuation.

Appraisers and lenders often use a Gross Profit Multiple (GPM) approach to value operating gas stations with consistent fuel and inside sales performance. However, Steilacoom is a non-premium site. Therefore, applying a full-market 6× GPM multiple is not justified.

The non-premium site designation was determined as a result of an income approach valuation. Based on a Gross Profit of $974,142, which has remained fairly consistent over the last few years, we feel that the gross profit value is stable. As such, our investment committee proposes a discounted valuation based on a 4.5× GPM multiple, which fairly reflects:

• The turnaround effort and capital needed to reopen

• Operating risk during ramp-up

• Absence of reliable trailing-36-months performance trending upwards

• Market comparable like Shell Madras (see below)

---

📊 GPM Valuation Basis

• Estimated Gross Profit (based on projections):
  $974,142 (from 2024 underwriting baseline)

• Industry Benchmark (premium station):
  6× GPM → $5.84M (used for stabilized, high-performing sites)

• Our Proposed Valuation (discounted):
  4.5× GPM = $4,383,639

Thus, our target offer would be:
➡️ $4.38M, reflecting future upside but accounting for present-day risks.

---

⚠️ Rationale for Discount

While the property is well located and structurally sound, there is no ongoing business justification:

• No current fuel volume or POS data 

• No inside sales performance

• No extraordinary existing customer flow

The seller is asking a price reflective of stabilized operations. However, as this is a distressed or under utilized asset, it warrants valuation as such — consistent with discounted income or asset-based appraisal methodology, not market-level GPM.

---

🔁 Benchmark: Shell Madras Comparison

Metric	Steilacoom 76 Shell	Shell Madras
Location	Tacoma metro (affluent)	Rural highway town
Operational Status	Non-operating	Fully operating
Gross Profit (est.)	$974,142	~$750,000
Asking Price	$6.15M	$3.4M
GPM Multiple (asking)	6.3×	4.5×
Business Turnaround Needed?	Yes	No

---

💰 Recommendation

We propose submitting a formal Letter of Intent (LOI) at:

• Price: $4.38M

• Basis: 4.5× Gross Profit Multiple

• Contingent on:

  • Fuel supply agreement terms

This reflects fair value given risk-adjusted projections — not a speculative bet on future stabilization.

---

🧮 When Could You Justify 6× GPM?

Gross Profit Multiples of 6× or more are reserved for premium assets — meaning the station is firing on all cylinders.

You could justify 6× when:

• ✅ Stable historical fuel volume (e.g., 80K+ gallons/month, verified)

• ✅ Strong inside store/café sales ($50K–$100K+/mo)

• ✅ 3+ years of clean financials and tax returns

• ✅ Repeat customer traffic with good visibility/access

• ✅ No major deferred maintenance

• ✅ Good fuel supply contract (rebates, bonuses, fair margin)

• ✅ Desirable location (urban, high-traffic corridor)

These stations are turnkey, bankable, and often produce 6-figure net cash flow from day one.

---

🧮 When Could You Justify 5× GPM?

A 5× GPM multiple is supportable for stabilized, mid-performing stations with modest upside or some operational gaps.

You could justify 5× when:

• ☑️ Operations are ongoing, but not optimized (e.g., undertrained staff, no café)

• ☑️ Gross Profit is stable, but could improve with better management

• ☑️ Real estate is in good condition, but not premium

• ☑️ Location has solid potential (traffic, neighborhoods), but not marquee

• ☑️ Moderate fuel margins (not sub-10¢/gallon)

This reflects a “solid performer with room to grow”, not distressed or high-end.

---

🧮 When Would You Use 4× GPM?

4× applies to distressed, rural, or high-risk turnarounds — where you’re buying a fixer-upper, operationally speaking.

Justify 4× when:

• ⚠️ The station is non-operational or only partially running

• ⚠️ Little to no verifiable POS or fuel volume history

• ⚠️ Deferred maintenance or capital repairs needed (canopy, dispensers, HVAC, etc.)

• ⚠️ Weak or no fuel contract

• ⚠️ Questionable location or zoning restrictions

• ⚠️ Requires heavy reinvestment to reach potential

At this level, the price assumes you're taking on significant business risk and need margin for error.

---

✅ Why We Chose 4.5×

Steilacoom 76 Shell is a non-operational, dormant asset — but it has premium potential:

• ✅ Affluent submarket (Steilacoom/Tacoma metro)

• ✅ Well-maintained structure

• ✅ Good visibility and access

• ⚠️ No current operations or fuel volume

• ⚠️ No inside sales or POS records

• ⚠️ Start-up risk remains high (staffing, permitting, ramp-up)

4.5× GPM is a compromise:
It reflects the physical quality and location upside without overpaying for a business that doesn’t currently exist.

This gives us margin for error, aligns with Shell Madras benchmarking, and allows us to invest in operations post-close.

---

Justification Table

Multiple	Conditions Justifying It	Notes & Numbers
6× GPM	Fully operational, premium station	Needs stable fuel volume, inside store income, verified margins, 3+ years of performance. Market data suggests only top-tier stations sustain GPM this high.
5× GPM	Stabilized operations with modest upside	Ongoing gross profit but some lag in optimization—reasonable location, moderate upswing opportunity.
4× GPM	Turnaround or distressed asset	No operations, high startup risk, deferred maintenance. Reflects buying with operational uncertainty.

---

Why 4.5× GPM is Appropriate for Steilacoom 76

Given the current status:

• Non-operational station—no fuel volume, no inside sales, no established income

• Requires capex, staffing, supplier setup

• Despite good location, this is effectively a zero-cash-flow asset today

So, 4.5× GPM is a midpoint acknowledging:

• Location and asset quality (above distressed)

• Lack of operations and ramp-up risk (below stabilized)

Calculation:

• Gross Profit = $974,142

• At 4.5× GPM, valuation ≈ $4,383,639

This aligns with the market average (~4×), but discounts for the station’s current dormant state and elevates from distressed multiples (4×) given the site quality.

---

Summary for Investor Reporting / Memo

"Steilacoom 76 Shell's asking price of 6× GPM is unsupported due to no demonstrated operations. Market data suggests average going‑concern multiples are ~4×. A 4.5× GPM multiple fairly values the upside while accounting for operational risk — arriving at an estimate of ~$4.38M."

Absolutely — here’s a tactical conversation script for your negotiation with the broker about the Steilacoom 76 Shell acquisition. It’s structured into:

1. Broker Arguments (what she might say to justify the $6M+ price)

2. Your Rebuttals (backed by market data and logic)

3. Framing Guidance (how to stay persuasive, calm, and professional)

---

🎯 Negotiation Framing

• Tone: Calm, respectful, numbers-driven

• Position: Serious buyer, doing the homework, offering fair value

• Strategy: Anchor with data, show openness, but control the valuation framework

---

🔁 Broker Arguments and Your Rebuttals

Broker Claim	Your Rebuttal	Supporting Logic
“It sold for $5.98M last time.”	“Understood, but market conditions have changed. And that price was likely based on full operations. Right now, this is a non-operating station with zero fuel volume or in-store revenue.”	Historical price ≠ fair market value today, especially if operations are halted.
“This is a premium location in Steilacoom.”	“Agreed on location. But location alone doesn't generate cash flow. Valuation still depends on income-producing ability, which is not present today.”	Real estate has value, but without operations, you’re buying land + shell + ramp-up risk.
“Shell is a strong brand. Once reopened, it’ll thrive.”	“Possibly, but I’m taking all the risk to get it there—staffing, supply, marketing, everything. That upside is not guaranteed, and I’m pricing that risk in.”	Investors pay for what is, not what might be.
“We’ve had other interest near asking.”	“If those offers are credible and bankable, I respect that. But SBA lenders still want the numbers to work—and at $6M+, DSCR starts to fail underwriting.”	DSCR = 1.2 or lower at $6M = risk to bankability.
“You’re getting the real estate too, not just the business.”	“Correct. Which is why I’m using a Gross Profit multiple model, not just SDE. Even on that basis, 6× is reserved for operational stores, and we’re not there.”	Market reports show 4.0× GPM average, and this asset isn't stabilized.
“There’s huge upside once you reopen.”	“True, and I’m excited about that. But upside belongs to the operator. Sellers aren’t entitled to be paid for work the buyer still has to do.”	You take the risk, you earn the return.

---

🧠 Sample Script (Live Call Style)

You: “Thanks again for all the info. It’s a solid property, and I think it has real potential—but we’re looking at this as a turnaround opportunity, not a turnkey buy.”

Broker: “It’s a Shell station in a great area, and it sold for nearly $6M a couple years ago.”

You: “That sale price was likely when it was fully operational. Right now, there’s no fuel volume, no in-store sales, and that changes the equation. The business isn’t generating anything at the moment.”

Broker: “Yes, but the brand and location still hold value.”

You: “I agree, and that’s why we’re not treating it like a distressed asset—but we’re also not paying a multiple that assumes it’s already stabilized.”

Broker: “We’ve had other offers near asking.”

You: “Fair enough. If one of those can close, we’ll respect that. But I’m sure your client also wants a clean deal that can pass underwriting. Right now, at $6M+, DSCR drops below 1.25, and the bank will ask tough questions.”

Broker: “What are you thinking?”

You: “We’re comfortable around a 4.5× Gross Profit multiple, which puts us near $4.38M. That’s a fair offer based on actual conditions, and we’re willing to move fast if the numbers align.”

---

🔐 Levers to Use

• Fuel Contract: Ask if a rebranding bonus or per-gallon incentive is available from Shell or 76 → offsets capex/ramp-up

• Seller Financing: Offer partial financing to bridge valuation gap

• Due Diligence Timeline: Offer quick close if price meets your valuation

• Environmental/Phase I: Require clean report + tank insurance confirmation

---

🧮 Recap: Data Points You Control

• Gross Profit: ~$974K

• 4.5× GPM Valuation: ~$4.38M

• Bankable DSCR @ 5.9M: Barely 1.39×

• At 6.15M: DSCR drops further, makes SBA risky

• Market Averages:

  • SDE multiples (with real estate): 3–4×

  • GPM multiples (national): 4.1× average

---

Would you like me to turn this into a one-pager or PDF-style investor/buyer sheet?

Open questions

1. Fuel contract

Yes — we can and should run this "Quick Reality Check" for the Steilacoom 76 Shell deal. Here's how each piece applies (or doesn't) based on the data we have and what we don't have due to the station being non-operational:

---

✅ 1. Check Fuel Margins

Gallons Sold × Cents per Gallon

❌ We can't check this — yet.

• The station is not currently pumping fuel, so there's no real gallon data to analyze.

• The P&L from 2024 doesn’t include gallons or fuel margin detail.

• You must ask the broker:
  👉 “Can you share past gallon volumes before shutdown?”
  👉 “What fuel margin (cents/gallon) was typical?”

Typical Target:
If the station pumped 80,000 gallons/month at $0.30/gallon margin, that’s:

80,000 × $0.30 = $24,000/month fuel profit ≈ $288,000/year

---

✅ 2. Add Store Margins

Inside Sales × 25–35%

❌ We can’t verify this either.

• There’s no breakdown of in-store sales (convenience store, café, etc.).

• Ask the broker:
  👉 “What were inside store sales prior to shutdown?”
  👉 “Do you have POS reports showing monthly sales?”

• If inside sales were $100,000/month, and margins were 30%:

$100K × 0.30 = $30,000/month gross profit from store ≈ $360,000/year

---

✅ 3. Subtract Payroll + Expenses

✅ We do have this.

From the 2024 numbers:

• Total Expenses (excl. payroll): $348,444/year

• Payroll: $0 (we assume owner-operator or not running)

💡 Normalized OpEx = $29,037/month

Conservative assumption: Once you staff up (3–4 FTEs), payroll could be ~$15K–$20K/month.

You could stress test this:

Projected Expenses = $29K + $18K payroll ≈ $47K/month

---

✅ 4. Run SBA Loan Numbers

Default Rule:

• 10–20% down

• 9–10% interest

• 10–25 year amortization

✅ You’ve done this already.

For a $5.9M purchase:

• Down Payment = $1.18M (20%)

• Loan = $4.72M

• 25-year @ 8.8% → ~$38.8K/month

---

✅ 5. See if You’re Positive

Net cash flow must be positive, ideally 10–20% cash-on-cash

✅ We’ve modeled this.

At $5.9M:

• Net Cash Flow (Post-Debt) = $183,036/year

• Cash-on-Cash Return =
  $183K ÷ $1.18M ≈ 15.5%

✅ Passes this test, but barely — especially when you add operational ramp-up risk.

⚠️ At $6.15M, DSCR and cash-on-cash both drop → not safe for financing without backup plan or upside guarantee.

---

🔁 Summary Table: Reality Check Analysis

Check	Status	Notes
Fuel Margins	🔴 No	No gallon data yet; must request from broker
Store Margins	🔴 No	No inside sales breakdown; POS data needed
Payroll + Expenses	🟡 Partial	We know expenses, assuming $0 payroll; estimate $15–20K/month later
SBA Loan Numbers	✅ Yes	DSCR = 1.39 at $5.9M; tight but acceptable
Net Profit / Cash Flow	✅ Yes	$183K/year, ~15.5% cash-on-cash return at 20% down

---

🧠 Talking Points for Broker

“I’ve run a full SBA model on this. The only way this works is if operations scale fast, and we hit normalized margins. But there’s no gallon or in-store sales data, so I can’t risk paying a 6× GPM or 9× SDE multiple based on air.”

“The return model does technically pencil out, but it’s thin. I’m looking at a 4.5× GPM valuation based on current risk and unknowns — and that’s still assuming I take all the ramp-up burden.”

---

Absolutely. Fuel contracts are one of your strongest negotiation levers when buying a gas station — especially one that’s shut down or has no current supply agreement in place.

Here’s how to frame the conversation, what to ask, and how to use the contract as leverage to bring the price down or improve your deal structure:

---

🗣️ Framing the Fuel Contract Conversation (with Broker/Seller)

🎯 Goal:

You want to understand existing obligations (if any), assess flexibility, and use potential new contract incentives to either:

• Reduce your cash at close (through bonuses or co-investment), or

• Justify a lower purchase price due to risk

---

✅ Questions to Ask:

1. "Is there an active fuel supply contract in place?"

• If Yes: Ask to review the term, price structure (rack + X), quotas, and penalties.

• If No: This is great news — gives you flexibility to negotiate a new contract with multiple suppliers.

2. "What brand was the station tied to before shutdown? Why was it removed?"

• Useful context — helps assess brand flexibility and possible debt/liens tied to previous agreement.

3. "What fuel volumes were they doing before operations stopped?"

• Fuel companies will want to see historical volume to decide what incentives to offer.

4. "Have any suppliers already expressed interest in rebranding or contracting the site?"

• Signals demand and possible competition.

---

💼 Positioning for Negotiation

If There Is No Fuel Contract in Place (Best Case):

You can say:

“There’s potentially $500K–$1M in rebranding capital or bonuses from a fuel supplier available here. That helps reduce my risk, but also means the real estate premium should reflect that it's currently unbranded and non-operational.”

Then offer:

“Let’s structure the price assuming I bring the capital — $4.5M base offer, with upside from fuel contract I arrange independently.”

---

If There Is a Fuel Contract but It’s Expiring Soon:

Say:

“If I’m inheriting obligations, I need a price adjustment. I’ll be locked into rack + X pricing, and there may be minimum volume penalties. That increases operational risk.”

Then counter:

“If we keep the price at $5.9M, I’ll need the seller to assign me fuel rebates or signing bonuses they’ve already negotiated, or we adjust the price accordingly.”

---

💰 Fuel Contract Incentives You Can Negotiate:

Type	Typical Value	Purpose
Signing Bonus	$200K–$500K upfront	Lump sum to sign multi-year deal
Rebranding CapEx	$150K–$300K	Canopy, signage, dispensers
Per-Gallon Rebate	$0.03–$0.06/gal	Paid monthly, improves margin
Loan Buydown Program	Varies	Supplier pays down SBA debt
Volume Bonus	$50K–$100K/year	For exceeding gallon targets

If you land even half of those, that’s hundreds of thousands of dollars in non-bank funding — which helps you reinvest or offset risk.

---

💡 Strategy Recap

• No contract yet? Use that to negotiate lower price, then negotiate supplier incentives separately.

• Existing contract? Push for either a price reduction, or assignment of any benefits tied to that contract.

• In both cases: Make sure the lender is aware of any bonuses, as they might require it to reduce the loan amount (to avoid double-counting capital).

---

Absolutely. Let's apply the Income Approach to value the Steilacoom 76 Shell station using both:

---

📈 Income Approach Valuation – Steilacoom 76 (2024)

The Income Approach values a business based on the income it generates. For gas stations with real estate, it can be applied two ways:

---

💰 Method 1: Capitalization (Cap Rate) Method

This focuses on Net Operating Income (NOI) and what an investor would pay for that income stream, based on market cap rates.

---

✅ Step-by-step:

Component	Value (2024)
Gross Profit	$974,142
Normalized Operating Exp.	$348,444
NOI	$625,698 = GP – OpEx
Cap Rate (conservative)	8.5% – based on Washington gas station comps
Implied Valuation	$7,360,000 = $625,698 / 0.085

🔎 Cap Rate Justification:
According to BizBuySell and LoopNet gas station comps (WA, OR), cap rates for stations with real estate range from 7.5%–10%, depending on traffic, location, and tenant strength.

📉 Higher cap rate = lower value, which protects against risk.

---

🔁 Method 2: Gross Profit × Multiple (GPM Method)

This method is used more often in gas station deals, especially with SBA financing, because it's simple, verifiable, and adjusts for thin net margins.

---

✅ Step-by-step:

Component	Value (2024)
Gross Profit (GP)	$974,142
Multiple (market)	4.5× (owner-operator, no premium performance)
Implied Valuation	$4,383,639

📉 GPM Multiple Justification:

• Station has no café, minimal inside sales

• Underperforming operations (no upside captured)

• Not currently owner-operated

• No evidence of premium gallon volume or trending growth

• Unclear or nonexistent fuel contract

---

🧮 Recap Table

Method	Basis	Value	Notes
Cap Rate	NOI ÷ 8.5%	$7,360,000	Too high — ignores risk & underperformance
GPM	$974K × 4.5×	$4,383,639	More appropriate for underwriting today

---

🧠 Interpretation

✅ We recommend using GPM × 4.5 as the current fair value benchmark for Steilacoom 76 due to:

• Operational underperformance

• No fuel contract (a major value driver)

• No clear inside sales data

• Absentee ownership

• Opportunity to improve, but no execution yet

---

Would you like me to:

• Show what it would be at 5× or 6× for scenario modeling?

• Or help you prepare talking points for a broker negotiation based on this income approach?

Your move.

You're absolutely right to question that — let’s break it down clearly and precisely.

---

✅ You're Correct: Cap Rate (Method 1) is less appropriate for valuing gas stations with active operations

Here’s why:

🏢 Cap Rate Method	⛽ Why It Doesn’t Fit This Gas Station Deal
Based on Net Operating Income (NOI) only	Gas stations often have thin NOI due to fuel’s razor-thin margins
Used by passive real estate investors	This is an owner-operated business, not just a lease investment
Works well for triple-net (NNN) tenants	No tenant here — you would be the operator
Doesn’t capture business upside or risks	This station lacks a fuel contract, has upside potential — not baked in

Cap rate method is good if:

• You’re buying a leased gas station and collecting rent

• The property has stable, long-term tenants

• The buyer is purely an investor, not an operator

---

✅ Best Practice for Gas Stations with Real Estate:

Use the Gross Profit Multiple (GPM) Method instead.

Why?

• Gas stations are hybrid assets (real estate + operating business)

• Gross profit captures fuel + store performance

• SBA lenders, brokers, and appraisers favor GPM for business + real estate combos when owner-operated

---

🧠 Final Summary:

Method	Use it when…
Cap Rate (NOI ÷ cap %)	You’re buying real estate only, with a passive lease tenant
GPM Method (GP × X)	You’re buying the gas station business + real estate combo
SDE Method (SDE × X)	Business only — no real estate

---

Would you like me to add this breakdown into your memo or negotiation prep materials?

Correspondence

Wednesday - August 2025 - Phone call: Saad:Laura

• Another buyer, brough an offer of $5.0M, but that was not received well
• Financing Structure
• Loan Type: Standard financing for this acquisition is an SBA 7a loan.
• Loan Term: 25 years.
• Interest Rate: An 8.75% rate (prime + 1.25%) is considered achievable with a 20% cash down payment. For conservative cash flow modeling, a 9% rate is suggested. The rate is adjustable.
• Property Condition & Due Diligence
• Appraisal: There is no current appraisal on file. A new appraisal, costing between $5,000 and $7,000, will be required by the lender once the transaction is under contract. An older appraisal supporting the previous $5.98M sale price may be available for review at that time.
• Environmental & Maintenance: The site, developed in 2000, has consistently been clean. A Phase One environmental report from about three years ago confirmed its cleanliness. Tank tightness tests are performed annually as required, and underground storage tank insurance is also required and in good condition. A new Phase One report will be necessary for a lender, as the most recent one dates back approximately three years.
• Appraisal - approximately 2 years ago
• Valuation Methodology: A key correction was made to the valuation approach. Lenders and appraisers in this sector use a multiplier of Gross Profit, not SDE, for valuation. The appraisal process includes three approaches: income, cost, and comparative.
• Given that this property generates income, we would use the income approach. 
• 2 years ago, buyer paid the purchase price of $5,980,000 - a price considered a premium even at that time
• A potential reason for the seller paying a higher price could have been to mitigate taxes through a 1031 exchange. 
• While this historical price is considered irrelevant to the property's current market worth, it likely sets a psychological price floor for the seller, potentially complicating negotiations for a lower price, as the seller might not accept less than $5.9M.

Next steps: 

• Schedule a follow-up call with Laura to review the updated financial projections and determine 
• Fuel contract?
• Income approach valuation?

Purchased for 5.9M, a couple of years ago

• While the historical price is somewhat irrelevant today to the property’s current worth, it may set a psychological floor for the seller

Out of the three approaches to real estate valuation, and appraisal, you suggested income (income, cost, comps)

• Two types:

• Net Operating Income (NOI) ÷ Cap Rate

• Gross Profit × Industry Multiple

• Which multiple are we using?

• Income Approach Valuation
• Gross Sales - Cost of Goods Sold = Gross Profit
• Gross Profit × Industry Multiple
• Gross Profit (2024): $974,142
• Typical Gross Profit Multiple (GPM): 5× (commonly used for gas station going-concerns including real estate) 

Estimated Going‑Concern Value = Gross Profit × GPM

                            = $974,142 × 5

                            = $4,870,710

This reflects the value of the entire operation—land, personal property, and business assets.

           "How many years of gross profit would it take to earn back the purchase price?"

                GPM = 3× → You’d earn back the price in 3 years (gross, not net)

                GPM = 6× → You’d need 6 years of gross profit to break even

⚠️ How to Use GPM in Practice

GPM Range	What It Usually Means	Should You Be Cautious?
2×–3×	Rural area, low demand	Probably underpriced
3×–4×	Normal business price	Fair deal
5×–6×	High traffic, urban	Fine if growth exists
>6×	Premium pricing	Needs strong justification

Bottom line, above 5x, need a big why

high traffic

high upside potential

strong fuel margins

Why did the buyer pay such a high price a couple of years back?

• 1031 exchange, mitigate taxes

✅ GPM Guidance for Gas Stations (with Real Estate):

• 4–5× = Very reasonable

• 5.1–6× = Caution, check comps and upside

• >6× = Premium pricing, needs strong justification (traffic, growth, zoning)

You are currently seeing 6.31× at $6.15M — above comfort range, even in metro WA.

Great question — and your instinct is correct. Let’s break this down clearly: